Classic Motorsports

discussion

Subscribe: One year subscriptions to Classic Motorsports magazine are only $19.95. Try a free issue of Classic Motorsports, No cost, no obligation.

  • Baxter

    July 31, 2008 2:06 p.m. Tim Baxter Online Editor

    Over there in the right column, you'll see something new.. "Yes or No".

    Vote early, vote often. (well, really you can only vote once).

  • AndreGT6

    July 31, 2008 2:22 p.m. André Rousseau Reader

    No

  • Nick_95_6sp

    July 31, 2008 2:54 p.m. Nick New Reader

    I voted yes, partly to offset A.R.'s "No" vote, but also because I like sports cars. A "classic sports car" should be a convertible. Otherwise to me it's a "GT" car. Come to think of it, I'd rather even have a convertible '59 Caddy than a hardtop/coupe and that ain't no sports car.

  • aeronca65t

    July 31, 2008 2:54 p.m. aeronca65t Reader

    With all due respect to André and all the other tintop enthusiasts,YES!

    When I got ~My '69 MGB Roadster~ earlier this year, my missus said: "You need two white roadsters??"

    Actually I have three since my race-Spridget is a roadster too (but it's BRG).

    I also have a fourth ('72 Midget) that she doesn't know about.

  • Gary

    July 31, 2008 4:16 p.m. Gary Reader

    I votes yes because of the joys of driving with the top down in nice weather. Ya can't beat it. But I like the looks of a hardtop or coupe better. That's why my Spit-rod will have the steel hardtop bolted on, probably permanently. I still have the Miata to go topless in when the weather cooperates.

  • AndreGT6

    July 31, 2008 7:30 p.m. André Rousseau Reader

    Well of course I'm going top opt for a hardtop.

    Its rained every other day this summer.

    Now, when I reach my vintage racer dream, it will most likely be an open top roadster due to my height and roll bar requirements.

    But till then, I will be a coupe lover.

    A.

  • David

    July 31, 2008 8:03 p.m. David S. Wallens Editorial Director

    I voted.

  • rconlon

    Aug. 1, 2008 3:42 p.m. rconlon Reader

    I voted. I have two convertibles but "better" would be better changed to preferred. There is something about an old clunker of a convertible with the top down that feels and looks much cooler than it might really be.

    Cheers Ron

  • David

    Aug. 3, 2008 11:18 p.m. David S. Wallens Editorial Director

    And don't forget, every week we'll have a new yes/no question. I can't promise that they'll always be about convertibles, however.

  • TR3only

    Aug. 4, 2008 6:32 a.m. TR3only New Reader

    I didn't vote because "better" is too vague. Better at what? I've owned a few convertibles and to me they are a seperate "breed" of car, anything else seems like just a vehicle. Having said that, there are 1 or 2 cars I've owned or driven, that were not convertibles and were not available as a convertible from the factory....but did things "better" than the 'verts I owned. Example? The Porsche 914 I owned. (Though, if I bought another one, I'd be tempted to have one of those California BeachBoys Customs conversions done to the 914 that turns it into a roadster.)

  • Baxter

    Aug. 4, 2008 7:51 a.m. Tim Baxter Online Editor

    Close poll! You can click "view all polls" to see the results.

    New one up this week -- how many of you are rolling on "classic" rubber?

  • AndreGT6

    Aug. 4, 2008 8:47 a.m. André Rousseau Reader

    I call for a recount heheheh

    Too many Chad's.

    A.

You'll need to log in to post.

Yes or No

I feel compelled to wear a silly hat when driving my Little British Car.



Check back Friday, Aug. 29 for results. View all polls